Economics 101 & Theology 101

Power & the Market: Part Two

Email Print

As we discussed last week, the exercise of private power is much different and more limited than public power. In spite of their riches, the wealthy are quite limited in how they can use force, which is what exacerbates and strengthens power.

For example, the Apple Corporation might like it if Apple products were mandated in offices, schools and hospitals. This would give them a significant edge over their competitors. It would also ease the competitive pressures which the market forces upon entrepreneurs.

These competitive pressures include things like:

  • Making products faster.
  • Making products that are able to do more.
  • Making products that are cheaper.

As consumers, we want these competitive pressures to be fierce and unrelenting. They force prudence and innovation upon business owners. They severely limit the coercive power that these individuals have on you and me.

However, political decree operates much differently. Under political decree, there is no system of reward based on doing something people want—making products and services faster, more productive and cheaper. More importantly, there is little discipline when businesses don’t meet the needs of others.

Political power uses coercion to accomplish its goals. For this reason, it can be very attractive for business owners to seek political protection to bolster their products over their competitors. This gives them the much needed edge that the market is incapable of giving.

Not one person on the Forbes Richest list has the power to protect themselves at the expense of others without the help of the government, the law or some official authority which coercively mandates it.

Here is a little thought experiment. Can you tell which of these people possesses the most power?

  • Forrest Mars, Jr.: he is worth $13.8 billion, and ranks #52 on the Forbes Billionaire List.  He makes candy. This is the family who created the Mars Bar.
  • Ralph Lauren: he is worth $7.5 billion and, ranks #122 on the Forbes Billionaire list.  He is a clothing designer and manufacturer.
  • Mark Zuckerberg: he is worth $17.5 billion, and ranks #35 on the Forbes list.  He created Facebook.
  • Jon Leibowitz: he probably makes a little over $200,000 thousand per year. He has a job that won’t land him on the Forbes Billionaire List: Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission.

Despite the fact that he makes far less money than the first three men on this list, Leibowitz is quite powerful. In fact, he has vast amounts of power, more than that of the other three men combined.

Leibowitz can sanction businesses. He can influence entry and exit in different sectors of the market.  These powers were not given to him by the market. They were given to him by virtue of his political office, by political appointment.

Mars, Lauren, Zuckerberg, and many other entrepreneurs who become wealthy would probably like to acquire that amount of power. They would like you to only have one choice: their product.  But without political power, they can’t do very much.

You see, no wealthy entrepreneur holds any special power in and of themselves. They may be able to drive a nicer car and live in a bigger house than you. They may be able to afford the best colleges for their children. But they hold no power over you or me.

Entrepreneurs must be responsive to what we want for their continued success. They are conferred unjust power and can oppress their competitors and those less powerful then themselves only if, and when, they lobby the government for special privileges.

I would argue that only in the market-economy can a twenty-seven year old share space and rank higher than men and women much older, who have been working at their businesses their entire lives. Markets are opportunity based. Though imperfect, they can sometimes provide hope for the destitute and constrain the wealthy from being oppressive.

It’s when society allows entrepreneurs to gain special privileges through the state – what we call cronyism – that the wealthy truly have an opportunity to oppress the least among us.

What do you think? Do wealthy people have power over us, and do markets give them this power? Leave your comments here.

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!

Further readings on Economics 101 & Theology 101

  • Economics 101
  • Public Square
  • Theology 101

Institute for Faith, Work & Economics is pleased to announce the launch of our latest book, Counting the Cost: Christian…

  • Economics 101
  • Theology 101

Is capitalism immoral? Answering this question from a Christian perspective requires returning to the Bible, taking its economic principles that we know…

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!