Economics 101

Hurricane Sandy & Election Day: What Do They Mean for Christians?

LinkedIn Email Print

What a week. Between Hurricane Sandy and today’s election, a lot of momentous events are taking place. How can we think about these events from a biblical, economic perspective?

Both have given me occasion to reflect upon what economists call the “Broken Window Fallacy.” Consider this quote from “What Is Seen and Not Seen,” an essay written in 1850 by the French economist Frederic Bastiat.

Have you ever witnessed the anger of the good shopkeeper, James Goodfellow, when his careless son has happened to break a pane of glass?  If you have been present at such a scene, you will most assuredly bear witness to the fact that every one of the spectators…offered the unfortunate owner this invariable consolation—“It is an ill wind that blows nobody good.  Everybody must live, and what would become of the glaziers if panes of glass were never broken?”…This will never do! [This consolation] stops at what is seen. It does not take account of what is not seen.

The lesson Bastiat articulates so well throughout his essay is that destruction does not provide beneficial opportunities for spending to stimulate recovery from the destruction. In other words: natural disasters are not an opportunity for economic growth or job creation.

It’s a common misconception that disasters are good for economic growth. Just last week the Atlantic Monthly published an article describing how storms stimulate the economy.

As Christians ponder election day in America, and as we reflect on last week’s hurricane, I believe there is no better time to reflect on Bastiat’s profound and important lesson.

Hurricane Sandy brought levels of destruction to New York, New Jersey, and Delaware that were unprecedented. These areas of the world do not live in traditional hurricane zones.

Many people are still without power and shelter.  Homes and businesses that were destroyed will have lifetime impacts on their owners, and many people’s savings may be wiped out as a result. Most estimates of the cost of the damage are around $20 billion. The New York Times reports that it could even be as high as $50 billion.

Our job as Christians is first and foremost to pray for the people affected, and to help them in any way we can – whether by giving a charitable donation to a church or non-profit poised to help, or by going and helping ourselves. But we are never called to embrace the storm as a chance for new building, new construction, and new economic growth. 

Here’s why:

  • Storms like these destroy scarce resources that we are called to steward. Why celebrate the violent destruction of those resources?
  • We shouldn’t use situations like these to call for an economic boost, because any new investments that are made are attempting to replace investments eliminated by the damage.

This is where economic thinking can help us to better understand God’s call to stewardship.

Destroyed resources bring with them huge opportunity costs. The money spent rebuilding homes and businesses after Hurricane Sandy would have been used on other projects and investments had the hurricane never occurred.  Those other projects are now just ideas, because the hurricane has forced people to redirect their savings to rebuild something that was destroyed.

Might it provide short-term benefits to some? Sure. If you are in the home repair business, your phone might be ringing off the hook right now. But all of the dollars spent on rebuilding was intended for something else.

Good stewardship requires understanding the following:

  • We are called to care for the scarce resources God entrusts to us.
  • Because we live in a world of scarcity, all of our investments and choices have tradeoffs.
  • Anything devastating our resources destroys something that people have built, tended to, and cared for – thus devastation brings high costs.
  • Flourishing depends on taking what we are given and multiplying it with our talents.

The last bullet is especially important. We don’t achieve human flourishing because of things like hurricanes, tornadoes and flooding.

Yes, there may be some short-term benefits for some people; however, this is not how the massive economic growth this country experienced in the twentieth century took place. We need plumbers, roofers, and mechanics for when things go wrong, but we also need many other people using their gifts and talents to grow the resources God has given us. All of our jobs contribute to economic growth, not just jobs demanded during trials.

Flourishing is set back by disasters, not fueled by them. For us to advance human flourishing we must create and innovate. Each and every one of us has the opportunity to create and innovate, regardless of our profession. As I think about Election Day and pray for the leaders of our nation, I hope that they will embrace flourishing as God intended and remember the important lesson of the broken window.

What do you think? How is flourishing best advanced? Do storms contribute to economic growth or not? Leave your comments here. 

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!

Further readings on Economics 101

  • Economics 101

Previously, we considered economic efficiency—the practice that explores how well (or poorly) a market economy uses its available resources to…

  • Economics 101
Can Economic Efficiency Help Society Be Good?

By: Dr. Alexander Salter

5 minute read

Efficiency is an important topic in economics. Broadly defined, economic efficiency describes how well (or poorly) an economy uses its…

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!