Economics 101

Fraud in Online Homeschool Curriculum Exchange Illustrates Need for Integrity in the Marketplace at Large

LinkedIn Email Print

Over the past few weeks I’ve watched a social experiment unfold that illustrates just how integrity, honesty, and trust matter for a free market. Free exchange significantly depends on the virtue of the individuals engaged in trade. Economics is not merely a science of numbers; it requires ethics.

Homeschoolers are often subdivided into tribes based on the curriculum they choose to use. This is helpful because there are points of common interest as people move through the school year at different rates. Discussions of how certain activities are best modified or facilitated help prevent isolation. Along with this community of shared knowledge, parallel markets tend to pop up to facilitate the exchange of used materials.

Normally these marketplaces are self-regulated—they are great examples of free markets. Sellers describe the used materials honestly and ship them carefully. Buyers pay in a timely manner. Even in a social media forum where there is relative anonymity, these sorts of exchanges have historically occurred without a hitch.

Recently, however, there has been a rash of fraud in one of the online exchange forums that my wife watches. Individuals with false accounts, sometimes multiple accounts, have acted deceitfully and disrupted the entire community.

The Fraud

Instead of the odd complaint about the condition not being quite right – a bent corner or unexpected highlighting – there have been numerous cases of individuals agreeing to purchase materials, paying, and then denying that the package ever arrived. They have persisted in denial despite tracking information that indicates delivery.

Due to buyer protections, the money gets returned to the supposed buyer and the seller loses out. Additionally, others have agreed to sell curriculum only to take the money and delete the account. The buyer loses money and gets nothing.

Forum rules prohibit these dishonest acts, but the recourse for defrauded individuals is often limited because of the reality of online marketplaces, which enable geographic diversity and relative anonymity. Since a package of a year’s curriculum can cost several hundred dollars, there are obviously a number of people upset by the dishonesty in the community.

Discussions are raging in the curriculum marketplace forum as moderators try to sort out means to prevent future frauds. The outrage is significant, but possible solutions are limited. There has been a noticeable decline in the number of postings of curriculum for sale. Why should someone risk selling to a social media account with a potentially fraudulent history and profile picture? Without trust, the market begins to fail.

How the Fraud Puts Everyone at a Disadvantage

One of the options available to those who desire to have access to an online marketplace with greater protection is to retreat to one of the big name exchange websites where a bigger player, like Amazon or eBay, has more coercive power to ensure the deal is consummated. This approach is not without disadvantages.

One disadvantage is that it simply costs more to exchange goods on big name marketplaces. When trust decays, the costs of exchange rise as both sides pay a mediator to help guarantee the exchange.

A second disadvantage is that distrust tends to negatively influence prices and sales for low volume sellers. It is more likely for someone to pay a bit more or simply choose to purchase from a seller with 10,000 sales and a high rating than from a family who sells only occasionally and has few to no ratings. The same concern over dishonesty that is destroying the free exchange in the social media forum costs agents in mediated online marketplaces, too.

A Society without Trust

The lesson of a homeschool curriculum market is a small-scale example of the economic costs of a society without trust. The unfortunate reality is that lack of trust costs money and reduces opportunity.

Shifting ethics in the broader marketplace instigate calls for more government regulation, consumer protections, and licensing requirements. These interventions in the market create overhead that costs time and money. Such regulations increase the difficulty of small businesses from entering the market, which disproportionately impacts people with less money.

There is no easy response to this growing problem, which extends beyond curriculum sales. For my family, we are waiting to see what the online moderators do before we make another purchase from the homeschool curriculum exchange forum. We may consider paying the higher price for new curriculum to avoid the risk. That protects my family, but it doesn’t fix the problem.

If we are to have a free market, we must have a virtuous society. That needs to start with Christians being meticulously honest in our dealings. It also needs to include creating workplaces and businesses that value integrity and fair exchanges. Without trust, the cost of marketplace participation will only continue to rise and opportunity for all—especially the poor—will only shrink.

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!
  • Defog

    First, as a Christian and former homeschooling parent, I would encourage interacting with the thousands of churches and physical gatherings where homeschoolers can exchange curriculum face-to-face without fear of fraud. These usually occur in the summer months or December. In Virginia, we also have a large information network for the Northern Virginia Homeschool Community which is free to join. Other places would do well to emulate SHARENets model.
    As a software developer and frequent user of eBay, Amazon, and many similar online exchanges, the anonymity of their users makes those sites rife with fraud – and no amount of regulation will ever curtail the evil that lives in mens hearts. Signing up for PayPal is truly a good idea. Costs to buy/sell on those sites is minimal (and if you are using some other knock-off niche site designed “just for homeschoolers” so you can save a dollar, well then “buyer beware” is all I can say).
    Obviously, as you state, there are disadvantages to being a low volume online seller, in that they have not earned the trust of their fellow buyers by accumulating a good feedback history. That is exactly the way life should be in the anonymous online marketplace! That is the self-regulating model. My rule of thumb is to never buy from someone with less than 99.5% good feedback and hundreds of prior satisfied customers, as those sellers have proved they are reasonably trustworthy. In addition, I check out their most recent sales feedback to determine if they have suddenly “turned sour”. All the tools are there for a safe and satisfying transaction. I have purchased over 400 items on eBay in the past 15 years with only 1 problem, and that was when I deviated from my rule of thumb (because the deal was just “too good” to pass up). Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, well…

Further readings on Economics 101

  • Economics 101

Regrettably, many American Christians know little about economics. Furthermore, many Christians assume that the Bible has nothing at all to…

  • Economics 101
  • Theology 101

It is not uncommon for many people to think there is an unbridgeable chasm between Christianity and economics. There are…

Have our latest content delivered right to your inbox!